|
Hi Bob,
I read the LGBT paper. Thanks for all the scholarly
work you put into it. I think you are dead on target with your analysis and the conclusions you draw. The difficulty with good exegesis isn’t the
scholarship or the scholar. It is, first, the refusal of the magisterium to be honest enough to accept the truth that the analysis reveals. And second to present the evidence in a clear and simple way, so that those of us who are philologically and philosophically challenged can grasp it.The sociological dynamics and theological underpinnings that have created and sustained
anti-homosexual bias have done all too good a job.
Add to this the insidious undercurrent of anti-erotic
influences and we have the mess that is rending the fabric of the church. I think that the real perversion that is at work in The problem for those who are trying to become Michael Crosby, OFM cap. did an excellent work on this in his
book THE DYSFUCTIONAL CHURCH. Unfortunately that book is no longer in print.Working with the LGBT community
has been challenging, painful, enlightening, insight producing,
and ultimately gratifying. It has also brought into high
relief the sin of spiritual abuse that the churches have committed against this minority. My constant hope is that I can help my sisters and brothers to break out of these abusive relationships and claim the dignity and spiritual heritage that is theirs. There is much that is of great value and richness in the church. There is,
as well, as much that is false sick and sinful. The challenge
to those I am committed to serve is to separate the life-
giving from the life-taking elements in conflict and
have the courage to stand up for the life-giving Spirit.
Wishing you the blessing of Christmas and for the New
Year. Tom ____________________________________________________________________________________
|
Tags: Responses